<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Honey almond cake</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.cake-off.com/2008/09/honey-almond-cake/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.cake-off.com/2008/09/honey-almond-cake/</link>
	<description>Where friendly rivalry could lead to a bun fight</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 29 Aug 2010 13:40:08 -0700</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.4</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Daniel</title>
		<link>http://www.cake-off.com/2008/09/honey-almond-cake/comment-page-1/#comment-1229</link>
		<dc:creator>Daniel</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 07 May 2009 09:55:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.cake-off.com/?p=103#comment-1229</guid>
		<description>Yes, I think the error in F-W&#039;s recipe in the Guardian is definitely with the oven temperature and cooking times, but not the quantities. It&#039;s rubbish when newspapers don&#039;t check recipes properly.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Yes, I think the error in F-W&#8217;s recipe in the Guardian is definitely with the oven temperature and cooking times, but not the quantities. It&#8217;s rubbish when newspapers don&#8217;t check recipes properly.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Patricia Swales</title>
		<link>http://www.cake-off.com/2008/09/honey-almond-cake/comment-page-1/#comment-1228</link>
		<dc:creator>Patricia Swales</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 07 May 2009 09:32:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.cake-off.com/?p=103#comment-1228</guid>
		<description>Very possibly, because I too found the cake to be barely cooked after 45 minutes at 160.  I will try it again at 180.  Will persevere because it is a delicious and unusual cake.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Very possibly, because I too found the cake to be barely cooked after 45 minutes at 160.  I will try it again at 180.  Will persevere because it is a delicious and unusual cake.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Daniel</title>
		<link>http://www.cake-off.com/2008/09/honey-almond-cake/comment-page-1/#comment-1227</link>
		<dc:creator>Daniel</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 06 May 2009 19:51:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.cake-off.com/?p=103#comment-1227</guid>
		<description>I&#039;ve made this one two or three times now and not had a problem with the quantities. I didn&#039;t have a congealed butter problem. Hm. Maybe your oven wasn&#039;t hot enough so it kinda &quot;leaked&quot; while cooking?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;ve made this one two or three times now and not had a problem with the quantities. I didn&#8217;t have a congealed butter problem. Hm. Maybe your oven wasn&#8217;t hot enough so it kinda &#8220;leaked&#8221; while cooking?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: patricia swales</title>
		<link>http://www.cake-off.com/2008/09/honey-almond-cake/comment-page-1/#comment-1223</link>
		<dc:creator>patricia swales</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 06 May 2009 14:38:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.cake-off.com/?p=103#comment-1223</guid>
		<description>This cake is delicious but I wonder if 350g of butter is the right quantity?  It seems an awful lot and the cake was standing in congealed butter the next day.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This cake is delicious but I wonder if 350g of butter is the right quantity?  It seems an awful lot and the cake was standing in congealed butter the next day.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
